diff --git a/How-to-Use-Sports-Insights-Responsibly-With-%EB%AA%A8%ED%8B%B0%EC%97%90%EC%8A%A4%ED%8F%AC%EC%B8%A0.md b/How-to-Use-Sports-Insights-Responsibly-With-%EB%AA%A8%ED%8B%B0%EC%97%90%EC%8A%A4%ED%8F%AC%EC%B8%A0.md
index bc54c00..2069330 100644
--- a/How-to-Use-Sports-Insights-Responsibly-With-%EB%AA%A8%ED%8B%B0%EC%97%90%EC%8A%A4%ED%8F%AC%EC%B8%A0.md
+++ b/How-to-Use-Sports-Insights-Responsibly-With-%EB%AA%A8%ED%8B%B0%EC%97%90%EC%8A%A4%ED%8F%AC%EC%B8%A0.md
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ It also makes comparisons easier. You can judge two analyses by the quality of t
 The quality of an insight depends partly on the quality of the information behind it.
 You should first ask where the underlying claim came from. Is it based on official team news, verified statistics, direct reporting, or an unattributed statement? Those sources deserve different levels of confidence.
 Keep this simple. Strong sourcing improves interpretation.
-Media organizations and industry publications such as **[svgeurop](https://www.svgeurope.org/)**e may provide useful context around sports broadcasting, technology, and related developments, but every source should be used for the type of information it is designed to provide. A media-industry source and an official team announcement do not answer the same question.
+Media organizations and industry publications such as **[svgeurope](https://www.svgeurope.org/)** may provide useful context around sports broadcasting, technology, and related developments, but every source should be used for the type of information it is designed to provide. A media-industry source and an official team announcement do not answer the same question.
 Responsible research means matching the source to the claim.
 
 ## Avoid Building Conclusions From One Signal